<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Rich Sharples&#039; Blog &#187; gpl</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.softwhere.org/tag/gpl/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.softwhere.org</link>
	<description>Musings on the world of software from the sharp end of the long tail</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 13:26:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Spring &amp; GPL v3</title>
		<link>http://blog.softwhere.org/archives/128</link>
		<comments>http://blog.softwhere.org/archives/128#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 02:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sharps</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gpl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JBoss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spring source]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.softwhere.org/?p=128</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Talking of Spring &#8211; SpringSource&#8217;s choice of license for their new &#8216;platform&#8217; seems to have sparked some discussion over on TSS. In a way &#8211; it&#8217;s sad that a perfectly decent product launch is over-shadowed by their choice of license &#8211; we (the OpenSource community) still clearly have work to do. I haven&#8217;t decided whether [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.softwhere.org/archives/126">Talking of Spring</a> &#8211; SpringSource&#8217;s choice of license for their new &#8216;platform&#8217; seems to have sparked some discussion over on <a href="http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=49243">TSS.</a></p>
<p>In a way &#8211; it&#8217;s sad that a perfectly decent product launch is over-shadowed by their choice of license &#8211; we  (the OpenSource community) still clearly have work to do.</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t decided whether their choice to dual license is smart or dumb and I also wonder if it was done with BEAOralces blessing &#8211; presumably they we&#8217;re a good partner at one point. Clearly SpringSource think they&#8217;re in a dominant enough position to make such a change &#8211; I guess their consumers will decide.</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.softwhere.org%2Farchives%2F128&amp;linkname=Spring%20%26%23038%3B%20GPL%20v3"><img src="http://blog.softwhere.org/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.softwhere.org/archives/128/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
