<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Blind Men and the Elephant</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.softwhere.org/archives/183/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.softwhere.org/archives/183</link>
	<description>Musings on the world of software from the sharp end of the long tail</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 10:45:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Sharples&#039; Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The JBoss Product Lifecycle Explained</title>
		<link>http://blog.softwhere.org/archives/183/comment-page-1#comment-6488</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Sharples&#039; Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The JBoss Product Lifecycle Explained</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Nov 2010 14:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.softwhere.org/?p=183#comment-6488</guid>
		<description>[...] So to summarize this rather long post &#8211; if you want to deploy your business critical applications and receive long term support from Red Hat then the JBoss Enterprise Platforms are what I would recommend &#8211; if you&#8217;re more interested in seeing how those platforms will evolve and more interested in emerging technology but willing to take on more risk then upstream projects are where you should be looking. It all a matter of assessing the risk. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] So to summarize this rather long post &#8211; if you want to deploy your business critical applications and receive long term support from Red Hat then the JBoss Enterprise Platforms are what I would recommend &#8211; if you&#8217;re more interested in seeing how those platforms will evolve and more interested in emerging technology but willing to take on more risk then upstream projects are where you should be looking. It all a matter of assessing the risk. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 451 CAOS Theory &#187; The elephant in the room</title>
		<link>http://blog.softwhere.org/archives/183/comment-page-1#comment-311</link>
		<dc:creator>451 CAOS Theory &#187; The elephant in the room</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 14:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.softwhere.org/?p=183#comment-311</guid>
		<description>[...] about open source software business models, Rich Sharples of Red Hat&#8217;s JBoss division weighs in on an issue I have with Savio Rodrigues&#8217;s categorization of open source users: namely the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] about open source software business models, Rich Sharples of Red Hat&#8217;s JBoss division weighs in on an issue I have with Savio Rodrigues&#8217;s categorization of open source users: namely the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

